2019 |
Match Group v. Bumble ⤷ U.S. #9,733,811 ⤷ U.S. #9,959,023 ⤷ U.S. #10,203,854 |
Bumble
|
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Cooley
|
Prepared an expert report regarding the invalidity of three patents. Deposed. Settled prior to trial. |
2018 |
Cypress Lake Software v. Samsung ⤷ U.S. # 9,423,923 ⤷ U.S. # 9,423, 938 ⤷ U.S. # 9,823,838 ⤷ U.S. # 9,870,145 |
Samsung
|
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Baker Botts
|
Prepared expert reports regarding the invalidity of and non-infringement of US patents. Was deposed, and prepared declarations in support of ex parte reviews. |
2017 |
Blackberry v. PanOptis Patent Management ⤷ U.S. # 8,174,506 |
Blackberry
|
US Patent & Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board |
Oblon, McCelland, Maier & Neustadt
|
Prepared a declaration in support of petition for inter partes review. |
2017 |
ARRIS v. Sony |
ARRIS
|
United States International Trade Commission |
Fish and Richardson
|
Case settled before reports were served. |
2017 |
Sony v. ARRIS ⤷ U.S. # 6,556,221 |
ARRIS
|
United States International Trade Commission |
Fish and Richardson
|
Prepared expert reports regarding the invalidity and non-infringement of U.S. patent. Deposed. |
2017 |
Apple v. Qualcomm |
Qualcomm
|
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Quinn Emanuel
|
Prepared an expert report assessing dozens of Qualcomm's patents. Deposed. |
2016 |
Sony v. Avago Technologies ⤷ U.S. # 8,147,332 |
Sony
|
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board |
Kirkland & Ellis
|
Prepared a declaration in support of IPR petition. |
2016 |
Apple v. Chestnut Hill Sound ⤷ U.S. # 8,725,063 |
Chestnut Hill Sound
|
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board |
Wolf Greenfield
|
Prepared a declaration in support of IPR response regarding validity of US patent # 8,725,063. Deposed. |
2016 |
Rovi Corporation v. Comcast ⤷ U.S. # 8,006,263 ⤷ U.S. # 8,578,413 ⤷ U.S. # 8,046,801 |
Comcast
|
United States International Trade Commission |
Winston & Strawn
|
Prepared expert reports on both the invalidity and non-infringement of US patents. Prepared a declaration regarding the non-infringement of a new design in the enforcement phase. Deposed twice, and testified at trial. |
2016 |
Immersion v. Apple ⤷ U.S. # 8,659,571 ⤷ U.S. # 8,749,507 |
Immersion
|
United States International Trade Commission |
Irell & Manella
|
Prepared an expert report (for ITC) and declaration (for IPR) on validity of US patents. Deposed, testified at trial. |
2015 |
Ericsson v. Apple |
Ericsson
|
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Bunsow De Mory
|
Consulted on case. Case settled prior to serving of reports. |
2015 |
Ericsson v. Apple |
Ericsson
|
United States International Trade Commission |
Winston & Strawn
|
Consulted on case. Case settled prior to report preparation. |
2015 |
BlackBerry v. Typo Products LLC ⤷ U.S. # 8,162,552 ⤷ U.S. # 7,629,964 |
BlackBerry
|
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Quinn Emanuel
|
Prepared expert reports on both infringement and validity of US patents. Case settled prior to expert discovery. |
2014 |
Cypress Semiconductor v. BlackBerry ⤷ U.S. # 8,059,015 ⤷ U.S. # 8,004,497 ⤷ U.S. # 8,519,973 |
Cypress Semiconductor
|
US Patent & Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board |
Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier, and Neustadt
|
Prepared declaration in support of inter partes review of US patents. |
2014 |
Aylus Networks v. Apple ⤷ U.S. # RE44,412 |
Aylus Networks
|
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Quinn Emanuel
|
Prepared a declaration in support of a claim construction brief. |
2014 |
Rockstar Consortium v. Google ⤷ U.S. # 6,037,937 |
Google
|
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Williams & Connolly
|
Prepared a declaration in support of inter partes review of US patent. |
2013 |
Apple v. Motorola ⤷ U.S. # 8,031,050 |
Motorola
|
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Quinn Emanuel
|
Prepared an expert report on the validity of US patent # 8,031,050. |
2013 |
Apple v. Samsung ⤷ U.S. # 8,074.172 |
Samsung
|
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Quinn Emanuel
|
Prepared expert reports on the invalidity and non-infringement of the asserted patent. Was deposed, and testified at trial. |
2013 |
Nokia v. HTC |
HTC
|
High Court of Justice, Chancery Division, Patents Court, Gr.Brit. |
Hogan Lovells
|
Consulted on the invalidity and non-infringement of asserted patents. Case settled prior to serving of expert reports. |
2012 |
Motorola Mobility Inc. v. Apple Inc. |
Motorola Mobility Inc.
|
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Keker & Van Nest
|
Case settled prior to expert discovery. |
2012 |
Apple v. HTC ⤷ U.S. # 5,946,647 |
HTC
|
United States International Trade Commission |
Quinn Emanuel
|
Prepared expert reports on invalidity and non-infringement of US patent # 5,946,647. |
2012 |
Apple v. Samsung |
Samsung
|
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Quinn Emanuel
|
Consulted on the invalidity and non-infringement of asserted patents. Case settled prior to expert discovery. |
2012 |
Apple v. HTC ⤷ U.K. # 2,098,948 |
HTC
|
High Court of Justice, Chancery Division, Patents Court, Gr.Brit. |
Powell Gilbert
|
Prepared expert reports on invalidity and non-infringement regarding software architectures for user interface platforms / operating systems. Testified at trial; per UK procedures, was not deposed. |
2011 |
Apple v. HTC |
HTC
|
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Perkins Coie
|
Consulted on the invalidity and non-infringement of asserted patents. Case settled prior to expert discovery. |
2011 |
Apple v. HTC ⤷ U.S. # 7,469,381 |
HTC
|
United States International Trade Commission |
Quinn Emanuel
|
The invalidity and non-infringement of a US patent regarding mobile user interfaces involving gestures on a touchscreen display. Deposed, testified at trial. |